Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Managing
a technology-rich classroom (p. 55-75). Teaching with technology: creating
student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
Summary
As part of technology integration,
there are several stages of technology concern within the classroom
setting. During entry, teachers cannot
anticipate and thus are unprepared for student misbehavior with
technology. Additionally, many schools
are not built to incorporate technology into the classroom and as such,
managing physical space and software becomes difficult. In the adoption phase, teachers integrate
these experiences into their cognitive framework and can now anticipate and
address problems. This paves the way for
technology to aid in other tasks during adaptation. Given a new comfort level with technology,
teachers begin to use it to increase efficiency in other areas of their
classrooms and lives. The authors
indicate that movement through these phases is supported via professional
development. Given the new classroom
context of multidimensionality, simultaneity, immediacy, and unpredictability,
guiding teachers into a new type of classroom management is critical.
Reflection
What
grabbed my attention in this chapter was the paragraph linking classroom
management and learning at the top of page 74.
Essentially, classroom management is a top predictor of student learning
and if teachers cannot keep students engaged in learning because of a lack of
classroom management, technology is useless.
It was this phrase that underscored
the relevance of this chapter in today’s classroom. The examples of floppies, laser disks, and 20
megabyte hard drives made me chuckle, but the concerns surrounding student
attention, time on task, and cheating with technology are ever present in my
current classroom. More than ever, our classrooms are multidimensional, simultaneous, immediate, and unpredictable and as one teacher
pointed out, students remain students, regardless of the technology they use. It is still our job to guide them into becoming
responsible for their own learning.
Technology has done wonders for
discussion in my writing workshops this semester. In classrooms where students won't speak, I can use tools that immediately (or almost so) allow me to know what everyone in the class is thinking and understanding. I use Socrative on a regular basis so that
students can contribute using their mobile devices. Otherwise, I can’t even get a head nod out of
them… “Does this follow an inductive structure?” I ask. Silence and stillness… I often joke with them
saying, “I guess I’m going to have to start a new open-ended question to get
you guys to answer. At least nod or
shake your head!”
At the same time, this wonderful
technology often makes me feel like my students are distracted or not paying
attention, especially when they choose to make my classroom include shopping or social interaction part of its multidimensionality. I see them out of the corner
of my eye, posting to Facebook or texting.
It makes me crazy, but at this point I ignore it figuring that the time
it will take to call out that one student will disrupt the flow of the class
more than the actual technology does.
I may have to rethink this policy
now that I realize how critical classroom management is for learning. Of course, a better solution may be to
rethink some of my teaching. The more I
put them to work with their technology, the less they are using it for off-task
purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment