Monday, April 15, 2013

Considering "Underage Children and Social Networking" from JRTE in light of ISTE NETS-S

Weeden,S., Cooke, B., & McVey, M. (2013). Underage children and social networking. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 249-262.

Weeden, Cooke, and McVey (2013) surveyed nearly 200 elementary students between 7 and 12 years old.  They found that students as young as 9 years old had social networking pages, despite the age restriction.  To circumvent this restriction, children lied about their age, often with their parents’ knowledge.  While many students realized that their photos and information posted are publicly available on these sites, 25% of the students did not.  To address these concerns, Weeden, Cooke, and McVey (2013) suggest providing safety information to students and caregivers early.  This would allow parents to help their students manage privacy settings and instruct students in responding to online harassment.

Until reading this article, I hadn’t given a lot of thought to children on the internet.  I’ve been assuming that kids today are pretty tech savvy; more so than their parents.  This article points out that my assumption is clearly a dangerous one.  The internet opens kiddos up to the dangers of interacting with adults they don’t know in their own home.  While we don’t need to make children afraid of the internet, we do need to make sure that they understand and interact safely.

The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) put out a series of National Education Technology Standards (NETS) for administrators, coaches, computer science educators, teachers, and students.  The student standards (NETS-S) address six areas: creativity and innovation, communication and collaboration, research and information fluency, critical thinking, problem solving and decision making, digital citizenship, and technology operations and concepts.



Considering the information Weeden and colleagues (2013) present, four of these standards apply to students and social media.

On the positive side, students (even young students) can use social media for communication and collaboration with peers, specifically to “Interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing a variety of digital environments and media” as per standard 2a.  Social media also presents opportunities to “Locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and media” and “Evaluate and select information sources and digital tools based on the appropriateness to specific tasks” as per standards 3b and c, respectively.  Social media are communication tools that allow students to coordinate and interact with a diversity of people.  These interactions result in exchange of information that students must be able to evaluate and use ethically.

As young students are not physiologically and emotionally ready to always behave ethically using social media (i.e. cyberbullying), this is certainly an area that teachers and caregivers should address.  Additionally, the use of social media provides opportunities for students to practice digital citizenship and understand technology operations and concepts.  Standards 5 and 6 are summarized as “students understand human, cultural, and societal issues related to technology and practice legal and ethical behavior” and “students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations.”  These standards address exactly what Weedan and colleagues (2013) suggest regarding online safety awareness.

For young students, digital citizenship really means not fabricating an age to use social media sites before the age of thirteen.  However, as teachers cannot keep students from creating such accounts away from the school setting, they can help students share information legally and responsibly and understand that these technology systems are often public; information shared cannot be retrieved or erased.  Based on Weeden and colleagues’ (2013) findings, elementary teachers clearly need to pay attention to these standards, incorporating them into their daily curriculum.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Twitter Response: OR Project


At this point, I have learned nothing about my teaching style, but have certainly confirmed previous observations of my *working* style...

Personal Professional Development Goal

While this post is EXTREMELY late (I blame general exams), I shall share one of my professional development goals anyway.

I know web tools piecemeal and am aware of the Bloom's Taxonomy 2.0 diagram, but I need to familiarize myself with the kinds of web tools available to my students for learning and communication.  So, by this time next year, I will visit all of the sites on the Bloom's Taxonomy 2.0 graphic.

Every Friday, I will spend 30 minutes visiting one of the sites on the diagram.  Long-term, I will create an evaluation table with a very brief description of each program, its ease of use, and its applicability to a science classroom.

I know I will have been successful if I can look at this table and see information for all 50 sites!